logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.01.22 2015노1180
실종아동등의보호및지원에관한법률위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal D was inside the Defendant’s office and contacted several family members, including his father, etc., and the Defendant did not recognize that D had withdrawn.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, D 2. Around June 2014, D 2. Around the two months, D 2. Around August 19, 2014, D 2. D 2. Around August 19, 2014, the investigative agency and the court below stated that D 2-months were not exposed until D 2-months were opened at the court below. B 2-months were resolved at the Defendant’s home, which he became aware of D 2-months, and in such a case, it can be easily doubtful as to whether D 2-months were not released in light of the ordinary common sense, and the Defendant appears to have been using the same fact as D her house (Evidence No. 31 of the evidence record), but the Defendant’s phone statement from the Defendant’s cell phone was not known to the police officer during the immediately preceding 16-round 2014. G 2016.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow