The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Items 1 through 8, 10 through 16, of seized evidence.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The prosecutor (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (one year of imprisonment) is too unhued and unfair.

B. Defendant (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing) 1) Part of the attached list of crimes related to the fraud of the crime of the lower judgment, among the list of crimes related to the fraud of the crime of the lower judgment, is a sale of authentic items, not a stolen, and part of the attached list, is a monetary transaction between individuals unrelated to the crime of the instant case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found a guilty has an error of mistake of facts.

2) The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. On the facts charged in violation of the Trademark Act, the court below ex officio: “ 2,038 (total price of refined goods 387,20,000, No. 4007873160000)” heading 113 (total price of refined goods 25,990,000, No. 4077786000), 60-70-7700-77779000-77000-777000-7700-77700-700-70-770-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-700-700--700--7000--7007.