logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2017.05.16 2017고단69
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A summary of the facts charged, B, an employee of the Defendant, was driving a C dump truck with respect to the Defendant’s duties in excess of 10 tons of the limited axiss, ① on September 27, 2002, 11.2 tons of 1.2 tons of the dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump 88, J., J., 200, ②

2. The former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995 and amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) which is a legal provision applicable to the facts charged of this case and Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Mar. 21, 2008), where an agent, employee or other worker of an individual commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 of the Act, the individual shall be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article

“The portion was retroactively invalidated in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (see Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga24, Oct. 28, 2010).

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, is not guilty pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow