Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 28, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and two years for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On August 16, 2005, the Daejeon District Court sentenced ten months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On May 17, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On September 7, 2009, the Suwon District Court sentenced one year and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On March 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment,
After that, on May 30, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced three years to imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 28, 2015 at the Seoul Detention Center.
At around 15:00 on September 3, 2015, the Defendant discovered that there is fear of visiting “F” used by the victim E as a lodging room within the “D” located in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, and that the victim intruded into the said lodging room through a visit in which the string of the string of the strings, and caused a theft of KRW 328,000 in cash on the wall owned by the victim and kept in the said space.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;
1. E statements;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports and investigation reports (verification of the date of release of a suspect);
1. Habituality of judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned and organized manner in the judgment;
1. Relevant Articles 332, 329, and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines for negligence;
1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply to concurrent crimes;