logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.23 2016고단1181
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1181" Defendant was liable for the obligations of approximately 40 million won, such as loans for financial rights and bonds, by 2015. On October 2016, 2016, the Defendant retired his/her employees from a restaurant and did not have any occupation or certain income, and did not have a golf product. Therefore, even if he/she received the price for the golf product, there was no intention or ability to deliver the golf product from others.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 12:00 on October 25, 2016, access to the carpet, “E” established in the Internet NVV in his/her own residence of Dogra 207, and, on its bulletin board, “(poper fol)” under the title “(d) sale to V3 SVF”.

Function such as strokes, etc.;

The timing of purchase shall be nine months of each year,

Colonel도요도요

Sales Price 30 30

In writing, “the golf products” was written, and the golf products were put on the Internet as if they were actually possessed by posting them together with the above writing.

The Defendant stated that “I will first deposit money and deliver the said goods to the victim F who reported and contacted the above notice,” and received KRW 300,000 from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant and received KRW 300,000 from the victim, and received KRW 6,385,00 in total by deceiving the victims in the same way 19 times from around that time to November 2, 2016, as shown in the attached list of crimes (6 pages).

On November 29, 2016, the Defendant posted a letter stating that “The Defendant will sell off the offline V3 (distance Measuring Instruments) after having access to the Internet E using his own smartphones at the Defendant’s residence of Dogra 207, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si.”

However, the defendant did not possess the above goods, so even if he receives the price for the goods from the victim H, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow