1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 24, 2016 to December 2, 2016, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff completed a marriage report with C on March 2, 1996, and has a child of D (E) , F (G) , and H (I) 2 South and North Korea under the sleep.

The defendant is the motive and initiative of the elementary school C.

B. C, as a first class mate on March 2015, was on board the friendly ship company affiliated with the friendly ship company at the early Indonesia at the early stage of Indonesia.

C. The Defendant and C sent text messages and Kakakao Stockholm messages from February 27, 2015 to November 19, 2015, from February 16, 2016 to February 18, 2016, including the expression “voluntary”, and the telephone conversations from September 14, 2015 to February 17, 2016, and taken photographs together from May 2015 to November 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 4, 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that: (a) from February 27, 2015 to February 21, 2016, the Defendant and C had a white conference text or Kakakaox message, etc.; and (b) the Defendant temporarily anchored at the Mayang National Port or the Incheon Young Port under the Mayang Flappppology, the Defendant disguisedd C’s family member with C to engage in an inappropriate act with C; or (c) accordingly, C continued to engage in an inappropriate act with C when leaving the land; and (d) the Plaintiff, his spouse, was suffering from a difficult loss to cope with C’s failure to cope with the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Plaintiff asserts that KRW 50 million should be paid consolation money.

Around February 2015, the Defendant first met C at the Dong Chang-dong group, which was introduced by C as a divorce South Korea, and was unaware of the fact of marriage. On December 12, 2015, upon contact with the Plaintiff, the Defendant terminated the relationship with C with the Plaintiff on December 12, 2015, but the relationship with the Plaintiff was settled on or around February 2016.

On February 21, 2016, the plaintiff asserts that there was no fact that the contact completely ceased, and that there was no illegality of the plaintiff's assertion.

B. The essence of the marriage is, such as where a third party intervenes in a marital life of another person, thereby causing the failure of a marital life.