The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant does not commit an injury by assaulting the victim.

However, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fines 5,00,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the court below duly adopted and examined the evidence as a whole; i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below; i.e., ① the witness of this case: (a) the court below stated in the court below that “I did not witness the victim’s head in the face of the victim; (b) the defendant and the victim took custody of the victim’s face; and (c) the victim stated in the investigative agency to the effect that “I am at the time of the defendant’s head without any circumstance; (d) the victim was the victim’s head in the face of the victim; and (e) the victim was the victim’s head in the face of the victim; and (e) the defendant stated in the investigative agency that “I am the victim’s head in the face of the victim; and (e) the defendant believed that there was no head in the face of the victim; and (e) the defendant’s statement was difficult to do so.”

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that recognized the crime of injury to the defendant is just, and there is no error of law of misunderstanding of facts as alleged in the grounds of appeal, so the defendant and his defense counsel's

B. The Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he/she had the record of punishing the Defendant for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant denies the instant crime until the party is in the trial.