A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant shall have a guarantor to obtain a loan from private finance, who is in need of agreement on drinking in the form of a drinking incident,” from the second group of Suppressions of Suppressions in the Suppression of the Gangwon-do Incheon-do Suppression group on the screen page of the Gangwon-do Personnel Group.” The Defendant shall be a guarantor to receive a loan from private financing. The Defendant shall be paid a full repayment of the loan within one year of each page.”

However, there was no fact that the Defendant was in a drinking accident, or that there was no need to reach an agreement. At the time, the Defendant had no particular property. At the time, the Defendant had an individual obligation equivalent to approximately KRW 40 million, and the monthly salary of every month was over KRW 250,280,000,000,000 for each month, with interest on loans, etc., and at least KRW 1,50,000,000 for each month, with a fixed living expense. Therefore, even if the victim was given a joint and several surety and received a loan, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to use it as an agreement for each type of accident or to repay it within one year.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim take advantage of the amount of KRW 30 million, including KRW 10 million in C, KRW 10 million in D, KRW 10 million in E Co., Ltd., and KRW 10 million in E Co., Ltd., and acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 30 million in joint and several surety by having the victim take out a loan under the name of the Defendant.

2. Around January 14, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence located in Chungcheongnam-gun F, would have borrowed money from the victim B, with his/her father’s house located in the Republic of Korea, to receive a loan of KRW 50 million as collateral, since he/she would have to receive a loan from his/her father’s house located in the Republic of Korea around January 2019.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to obtain a loan of KRW 50,000,000 as security around January 2019. At the time, the Defendant had no particular property, while the Defendant had a personal obligation of KRW 70,000,000.