A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on April 27, 2015, the Defendant expressed, without any particular reason, the victim D’s desire to “I amb off the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and the Defendant expressed the disturbance on the floor, so that customers can get the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the draft D;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (limited to cases where the defendant has a record of being punished several times due to the crime of interference with business, taking into account the fact that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim and that the defendant seems to have been sufficiently informed of the opportunity for sufficient accommodation during the period of detention, etc.);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;