Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Criminal facts

At around 21:51 on March 19, 2017, the Defendants reported the disturbance, such as the flow of alcohol at Defendant B’s hand, and thereby, Defendant A sent it to the scene after receiving the above 112 report, and confirmed the details of the report, etc., to the police officer, who belongs to the police officer of the Ulsan-gu Police Station Estation in Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S., where the Defendants sent it to the site and confirmed the details of the report.

us us

As a result of the sound "Fatra", the head of the F was satisfing with fat, and was sating with fat as a hand.

Defendant

B Doing to arrest the above A as a current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties, and arrest the police box G and patrolmen belonging to the same police box, and obstructed the Ha, a police box affiliated with the same police box to restrain him, “I was flick and flicked,” and flicked the flick of the above I by hand, “I was flick and flicked.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Written Statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Although the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, two Defendants do not be subject to the responsibility of obstructing the performance of official duties in the name of the police officer sent out due to the breathing of flaps, etc., all the Defendants reflect their mistakes, Defendant A did not have any history of punishment prior to the instant case, Defendant B did not have any history of punishment after 1999, Defendant B received from I among the victimized police officers, and the motive, means and results of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime.