The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court and the first instance court in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have found all of the facts charged in the instant case guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending

In addition, the argument in the grounds of appeal that the defendant did not properly receive the assistance of a public defender during the trial of the court below is not acceptable in light of the progress of the trial of the court below, the reasons why the public defender was appointed, and the contents

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.