logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2017.09.19 2016가합204123
건물명도
Text

1. Defendant D’s bankruptcy trustee of the Plaintiff Bankrupt Korea Savings Bank Co., Ltd. shall be KRW 3,300,000.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 11, 201, Korea Savings Bank Co., Ltd. and Promotion Savings Bank Co., Ltd. entered into a lease agreement with E on real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and the Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., and the said lease agreement was succeeded from E on December 22, 201.

B. The Korea Savings Bank Co., Ltd. and the Korea Promotion Savings Bank Co., Ltd. were declared bankrupt on April 24, 2013. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs appointed as bankruptcy trustees of the said companies concluded a lease agreement with F on April 24, 2014, with a deposit of KRW 100,000,000 for each of the instant real estate ( KRW 60,000,000 for the Plaintiff Savings Bank trustee in bankruptcy, and KRW 40,000 for the Plaintiff Promotion Savings Bank trustee in bankruptcy, and KRW 2,50,000 for monthly rent ( KRW 1,50,000 for the Plaintiff Savings Bank trustee in bankruptcy, KRW 1,00,000 for the Plaintiff Promotion Savings Bank trustee in bankruptcy, and KRW 1,00,000 for the Plaintiff Promotion Savings Bank trustee in bankruptcy, and value-added tax for the period from May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2016).

C. On March 24, 2015, between F and Defendant D, Defendant D succeeded to a lease agreement on each of the instant real estate between the Plaintiffs and F, and Defendant D entered into a contract to replace F with the lease deposit paid to the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

On February 24, 2016, the Plaintiffs notified Defendant D of their intent to terminate the said lease agreement as of April 30, 2016, without any further renewal of the lease agreement with Defendant D and the said real estate, based on ombudsman’s intention that each of the instant real estate was sold to another person through a joint public auction, and that the buyer would not succeed to the lease agreement concluded between the Plaintiffs and Defendant D.

E. On April 28, 2016, the Plaintiffs regarding each of the instant real estate between the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff and the Intervenor.

arrow