logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고단1794
특수상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Around 13:00 on February 18, 2017, the Defendant discovered that the victim C (62 Do) was taking a cover of the above land and cutting a stone to the above land, and the victim stated that “In this case, the fright to shot up the land adjacent to the land adjacent to the land where the fright to fright would come into the land where the fright would come into the fright to fright,” while making a dispute with the victim, the victim fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright the victim’s face to fright to fright the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against C, D, or E;

1. A report (special violence, etc.);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (including the attachment, etc. of criminal tools and photographs of damaged parts);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Prior to the instant case’s reason for the protection and observation of protection and the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the Defendant had a large number of records of punishment against the Defendant prior to the instant case, and there are five criminal records of violent inclinations, and the Defendant has threatened the victim with dangerous objects of his own judgment twice while committing the instant violence.

arrow