logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.01.15 2019가단14348
건물인도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B indicated in the attached Form 1 List No. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant B and D

A. Among the grounds for the attachment of the claim, the part corresponding to the above Defendants is indicated in the attachment of the claim

(Attached 2, 4, 6 List and Attached 2, 3, and 5 drawings were omitted). (b)

Judgment by deeming the confession based on recognition (Article 150 (1) and (3) and Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. 1) The vice-head of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “the vice-head of Bupyeong-gu”).

Around February 27, 2009, approximately 74,991 square meters in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu (at present, approximately 75,338 square meters in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon) are project implementation districts.

(2) On October 9, 2009, the head of Bupyeong-gu approved the establishment of the Plaintiff, a housing redevelopment improvement project association, to implement the housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”) in relation to the said project district on public inspection and publication for the housing redevelopment improvement plan and the designation of the rearrangement zone.

3) On December 14, 201, the Plaintiff received authorization for the implementation of the instant project from the head of Bupyeong-gu, the Plaintiff received authorization for the implementation of the instant project from the head of Bupyeong-gu, and on April 10, 2019, obtained the approval for the implementation of the management and disposal plan from the head of Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, and on the same day, the management and disposal plan was publicly announced. 4) Defendant C, a house located within the instant project area, around September

The above real estate was transferred to the real estate stated in the port, and the above real estate was leased and occupied.

5) On December 13, 2019, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 684,570 as the director’s expense with Defendant C as the principal deposit. [The entries in the evidence of subparagraphs A1 through 3, A4-3, and A5 through 9, respectively, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

B. As seen in the above facts of recognition, the management and disposal plan of the instant project was authorized and publicly announced, and the Plaintiff deposited the director fee to Defendant C, and the Defendant C deposited the director fee, barring any special circumstance, is ordered to the Plaintiff.

There is a duty to deliver the real estate mentioned in the subsection, and there is no other right of the plaintiff.

arrow