A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) was a person who commemorates C (one’s name “D”) that was famous in C (one’s name “D”); (b) was produced by the first director of the F Museum (Seoul Specialized Museum registered in Culture and Tourism Department) located in E in P; and (c) demanded H to revise the side of the Dong on the ground that it was covered by the Japanese bank, other than the Japanese side, which was set up in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the D that was set up in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (d) but was rejected, the Defendant was able to think that H was pro-Japanese; and (d) was able to bring a complaint to the F Museum building.

around 16:58 on May 31, 2018, the Defendant entered the central door of K (LMN exhibition room, wooden tank, and 108.11 square meters on a piece of floor) in the above F Museum operated by J, which is a son of H, and destroyed a structure used for public interest by putting fire in a fireproof way inside the right side of the instant building and 40 points of wood work, such as N, exhibited inside the said building.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to theO, P, and J;

1. Each protocol and list of seizure;

1. On-site reports on the results of field identification, photographs of a fire site, reports on the results of identification of a fire case, each legal and chemical appraisal report, reports on the results of fire identification, comprehensive reports on the occurrence of a fire, and the ledger of F museum buildings;

1. Records of the arrangement of CCTV images taken, each 112 reported case processing table, and message pictures sent by the suspect to the H's wife during the estimated time of commercialization;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on voice recording CDs reporting 112 by the person complained against, and the arrest of the suspect, at the time of notification;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 165 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The Defendant’s assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 53 and 55 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the following grounds for sentencing) of the Act on the Reduction of Small Amount, alleged that there was no fact that the Defendant did not go to K in the F Museum. However, it is recognized based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court.