logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.10.14 2019나2046474
분양대금 반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the plaintiff C's conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. The plaintiff A and B-.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) other than determining the conjunctive claim added by Plaintiff C in this court under Paragraph (2) below, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus, (c) other than the summary and the attached form pursuant

(B) The court below's determination on the conjunctive claim by Plaintiff C on February 2, 199, on the following grounds: (a) even if all of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff were met, the Defendants deceiving the plaintiffs in violation of the duty of disclosure under the good faith principle as to the existence of the columns in selling each of the instant stores to the plaintiffs; or (b) the existence of the columns in each of the instant stores is not sufficient to recognize that the existence of the columns in this case is an important part to the extent that it

A. Defendant C’s assertion did not notify the Plaintiff of the existence of the pillar while selling the instant shopping mall M to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C or J did not know the existence of the pillar and did not have a position to know as well as to know it.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 9(1) of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings and Article 667(2) of the Civil Act, Defendant E, a seller of the instant commercial building, is obligated to pay the Plaintiff, a sectional owner, the compensation for damages equivalent to the value decline arising from defects in lieu of the repair of defects in the existence of columns in the instant commercial building Mhode, and damages for delay.

B. As shown in the above facts of recognition, J, the spouse of the Plaintiff C, performed PM services and marketing management duties related to the instant commercial building; was permanently stationed at the site as a responsible person from the time of commencement of sale; and was in exclusive charge of model voucher operation and sale management; and ② J may know in detail the design contents of the instant commercial building.

arrow