logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고정1382
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2015, the Defendant was the chairperson of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council for Representatives of Residents of Apartment C and the victim D as the representative of the Dong, and the Defendant was dismissed from office by the above chairperson and the Dong representative on the ground of the violation of the Presidential Decree of the Housing Act on December 20, 2015.

When the victim thought that he was dismissed by filing a complaint against the Defendant’s heavy parking restriction violation with the office of Eunpyeong-gu, the competent office of Eunpyeong-gu, and the victim knew of the fact that he was accused of the fact that he illegally carried out a paid parking lot business (the parking lot provided to the occupants and received parking expenses) that was illegally carried out in the above apartment in the above apartment site to the above office of the Gu, the Defendant held a general meeting of residents of the C Apartment at around 17:00 on February 20, 2016 and filed a complaint with the Gu office for about 80 to 90 on the third floor of the above underground parking lot and filed a complaint with the Gu office for the fee parking business of the outside vehicle in the name of the residents of approximately 80-90, the Defendant did not report the parking lot revenue to the office of tax offices from November 18, 200 to 205.

It is facing the situation to be paid by the end of February 2016 due to the imposition of income tax and additional tax of 16,126,610 won in the 16,610 won in the low conference of the representatives of occupants of C Apartments, and it is difficult to give and receive this problem as it is, and D has no choice but to do so because D want to act as the president.

Then, it has reported and dismissed the low term on the ground of reappointment, and D has caused this confusion while acting as an agent for D's own name.

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow