logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.21 2018나70174
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim added at the trial and the plaintiff's appeal are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the party member of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) up to No. 15 No. 2 of the decision of the court of first instance from No. 3 to No. 5; (b) as a result of the appraiser No. 15; (c) as a result of the appraiser No. D’s appraisal of the first instance court appraiser No. 1; (d) as a whole, the appraiser No. 1 presented that “the name of the defendant affixed on the loan transaction agreement of this case (Evidence No. 1-1) shall be presumed to be a stamp image different from the Defendant’s seal affixed on the Defendant’s seal imprint No. 1-1; (e) the name and address of the Defendant’s name and address stated on the Defendant’s letter of commitment No. 2 (Evidence No. 1-1) prepared by the Defendant; and (e) the Plaintiff’s name and address stated on the Plaintiff’s letter of credit transaction (Evidence No. 8); and (e) the Plaintiff’s name and address stated on the Defendant’s name No. 1-2’s letter of credit transaction agreement of this case.

2. The plaintiff's second preliminary claim is judged, and the defendant in his name is the non-party company.

arrow