1. The judgment of the first instance court is modified by the plaintiffs' lawsuit acceptance system as follows.

The defendant 15.15.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On October 23, 2011, B driven a cab (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 20:10, and caused the Defendant vehicle to suffer injury, such as a pellet, pellet, etc., while neglecting the duty of front section and left right and left right and left right and left right and at the right angle of the bus terminal located on the front section of the bus terminal located in Gyeonggi-gu D from the front section of the damaged vehicle, due to the collision of the front section of the Defendant vehicle with the front section of the damaged vehicle, and caused the Defendant vehicle A, who was on board the back section of the damaged vehicle, by failing to properly operate the steering direction and brake system, was on the ground of the negligence of failing to properly operate the steering direction and brake system.

(2) After the death of the deceased, the above A received treatment at a H hospital, etc. on June 22, 2012, and was sentenced to the first instance judgment on December 10, 2013, and thereafter died on January 10, 2014 (hereinafter “the Deceased”) during the process of the first instance trial based on both the original Defendant’s appeal, and following the death of the deceased, the Plaintiffs, who were their children, succeeded to the deceased’s property according to the respective 1/7 ratio, respectively.

(3) Meanwhile, the Deceased is the mother of Plaintiff F, who is the driver of the victimized vehicle, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4, Gap evidence 5-1 to 4, Gap evidence 7-1 to 22, Gap evidence 17-1 to 2, Gap evidence 17-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

B. According to the recognition of liability and the recognition of the above-mentioned facts and evidence, there was no signal, etc. on the running direction of the Defendant vehicle, while the Defendant vehicle intended to turn to the left, while the damaged vehicle intended to turn to the left, so the driver of the Defendant vehicle as the driver of the vehicle gives the path to the victimized vehicle by temporarily stopping the vehicle before entering the intersection and examining the direction of its progress.