1. The Defendants: (a) each of the Plaintiff KRW 150,272,00; and (b) as to Defendant A from July 14, 2017, the Defendants were to each of the Plaintiff on October 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant A is a horse customer, Defendant B is a person who served at the Plaintiff’s regional headquarters C as the head of the sales division of the part-time horse sales division of the Plaintiff’s part-time horse sales division.

B. The term “purchase ticket” means a ticket issued by a marina society by stating the amount, identification number, extinctive prescription, etc. so that it can be exchanged with a horse racing ticket, and thus, the Act prohibits “payment of money for the use and use of horse,” i.e., payment of money for horse racing tickets, and credit card transactions and credit transaction with respect to the right to purchase. Article 2 of the Code of Ethics for the Workers Working on the Horse Voting, provides that “In the case of the sale of horse tickets, the sale of horse tickets shall be made by receiving cash or purchase tickets at all times and shall not be made on credit with pan

C. At around 13:50 on July 14, 2017, Defendant B requested the issuance of credit equivalent to KRW 300 million to Defendant A, who had been aware of prior to this date, at the five-story D sales office of the E building in D, Defendant B ordered the sale of each part-time horse sales office F, G, and H on the five-story D sales office of the E building in D, and sold 100,000 won of purchase from 14:00 to 15:00 on the same day, and the purchase price shall be 10,000 won of purchase price from 14:00 to 15:00 on the same day. Accordingly, Defendant B ordered the other members to pay the purchase price in electronic form as if Defendant B received cash directly from Defendant A.

Defendant B delivered 3,00 copies of purchase rights from other sales sources to Defendant A, and Defendant A received 300 million won in cash from 17:00 to 20:00 on the same day all purchase rights equivalent to 300 million won through D’s each counter.

E. Defendant A was prosecuted under the above criminal facts as the crime of fraud, and was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment in the above criminal trial, and became final and conclusive as is (U.S. District Court 2018No620), Defendant B was indicted under the name of the crime of occupational breach of trust due to the above criminal facts, and one year of imprisonment and a suspended execution in the above criminal trial.