1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. As such, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

In the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "this court" in the 9th part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "court of first instance".

In the first instance court's decision No. 14 through 15, "each entry in the evidence No. 6 through 9" shall be deemed "each entry in the evidence No. 6 through 9, 14, and 15".

The part of the 6th part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which corresponds to the argument, shall be referred to as "related to it".

Of the 6th 9 through 10th 10th 10 cases, the part of the first instance court’s judgment stating that “the Plaintiff did not have a big difference from the money remitted to the instant company on the same day by the same day (this seems to be due to the difference between the exchange rate and the actual exchange rate at the time of purchase or transfer of foreign currency; hereinafter the same applies).”

This Court is referred to as the "court of the first instance" in the last sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Of June 18, 200 and June 15, 200, the part of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance, "if the Plaintiff and Defendant B converted USD 200,000 to the exchange rate of June 18, 2002 (US$ 1,266.3 won per US$ 1,266.3 won)" (i.e., USD 200,000 x 1,266.3 won x 1,266.3 won), the sum of the investments that Defendant B remitted to the instant company by the Plaintiff and Defendant B on June 18, 202, there is no big difference from the amount that Defendant B withdrawn to its own account on the same day (i.e., USD 200,000, US$ 1,236,366,300 x 206,20636,300 won)." (ii) The exchange rate of June 18, 2002

The 8th judgment of the first instance court is also supported by the details of financial transactions," and next D, which has remitted USD 340,000 to the company of this case, shall also be the company of this case in its name.