The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below and the court below in light of the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the first instance court, it is just to find the facts charged in this case guilty on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. There is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles on the following: (a) the facts are found to have exceeded the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules; (b) the modification of indictment; (c) the essential part of the amendment of indictment; (d) the disclosure obligation of fraud; (e) the patent right and the effect of the right to

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal is permitted for the wrongful grounds for sentencing. Thus, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.