beta
Text
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;
2. The plaintiff's claim against the above cancellation portion is dismissed.
3.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 26, 2012, the Plaintiff received the phone call from the telephone service provider’s employees, police officers, and employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc. to the effect that “I would like to link police officers immediately because you did not automatically transfer the phone fee.” Since there is a problem in the automatic transfer passbook, I would like to link police officers immediately, as the Plaintiff’s passbook is registered as an accident account, there is a risk that cash remaining in the current account will be withdrawn externally. In this context, the Plaintiff opened a new passbook and opened a new passbook and notified the bank account number and the security card number to the effect that “I am out through a cell phone number to be known.” From now to the effect that “I am out through a cell phone number to be known.” After cancelling the existing passbook, I sent the password and the security card number to another head of the Tong.
B. Around October 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received a call from a person who was unaware of the name of the Defendant to the effect that “I would like to give a low interest on the part of those who would have a large number of, and fall short of the ability to repay; (b) I would have to open a passbook; and (c) written the principal and interest on the passbook in order to send it to us; and (d) I would have given a loan of KRW 2,00,000,000 to one bank with the passbook, and then I would have given a loan to us; and (d) after opening the passbook in the name of the Defendant, I sent the said passbook to
C. The Defendant established the above passbook and deposited KRW 10,000,000. On October 26, 2012, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 6,000,000 from the passbook under the name of the Defendant to the passbook under the name of the Defendant, and all of the withdrawals was made on the same day, and the payment fee was settled, and the amount of KRW 6,000 remains in the passbook under the name of the Defendant.
As above, the defendant was placed on the ground that he transferred the means of access by delivering the passbook, etc. under his name to a third party.