Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle C in salary C and C (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).

On July 28, 2017, the Defendant driven the Defendant’s vehicle on July 10, 2017, and proceeded the front of the E in front of C in Chungcheong City along the two lanes from the mountain to the goldside.

At the same time, the G Coin of the victim F (69 years old) driver's Gcoin of the 3-distance intersection where the signal, etc. was normally operated at that time was in progress in the same direction as the Defendant's vehicle. In such cases, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the signal in accordance with the direction of the frontline signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and brought up the front part of the above vehicle driving by the victim F on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the negligence of violating the signal by making the green straight spawn.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim H (the age of 77) who is a passenger of the Defendant’s vehicle by occupational negligence as above, to suffer injury to the victim H, a victim of the vehicle (the age of 77), such as a breathing of a brush in detail, which is in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim F, by causing approximately five weeks of treatment to inflict injury, such as a chest breathy,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. The actual survey report, on-site photographs, and video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (in cases where a signal device emitted only from pictures, such as green, yellow, red, etc., is installed on the intersection, and there is no other indication that allows non-protected left-hand turn or U-turns, the latter or U-turn shall not, in principle, be permitted for the left-hand turn or U-turn;

It should be seen (see Supreme Court Decision 2004Do5848 delivered on July 28, 2005), and in this case, the defendant's vehicle conflicts with the latter vehicle in the same direction, other than the latter vehicle.