logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.08.29 2016나12081
낙찰자지위확인 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “Nos. 6 and 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance” under Section 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be “No. 6, 9, and 11 of the court of first instance”; “No. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance” shall be “No. 6, 9, and 11 of the court of first instance”; and “No. 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance” shall be

[Supplementary Parts] Around May 2014, the Plaintiff participated in the 30-year production of the Korea Bioscience and Technology Research Institute, and around August 2014, the Plaintiff participated in the 30-year production of the Korea Bioscience and Technology Research Institute (hereinafter “Korea Bioscience and Technology Research Institute”). The Plaintiff has experience in participating in the 2015-year production of the Daejeon Local Government Procurement Service’s announcement of the Public Procurement Service’s 2015 Public Procurement Service

Nevertheless, in this case, the Plaintiff did not meet the qualification requirements for participation in bidding related to micro enterprises.

7 The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant publicly announced the Plaintiff on the national website around August 27, 2015 as a priority negotiation subject, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow