1. All of the plaintiffs' claims that have been changed in exchange in the trial are dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ status relationship 1) Plaintiff D, Defendant, F, G, H, and I were children of J and their wife, Plaintiff A is F’s wife, Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C are F and Plaintiff A’s children, and L is F’s children. 2) G was deceased on May 15, 1964; J was on October 1, 1982; K was on December 13, 2003; and F was on December 15, 2006.

B. On July 31, 1996, K is to specify only the parcel number with respect to the land of 467 square meters prior to Daegu Suwon-gu M, Daegu-gu, which was owned by it (hereinafter “the land”).

(2) On July 14, 1998, K sold M land to N on July 14, 1998, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of No. 79904 on July 31, 1996, the Daegu District Court registered its registry office, and the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of No. 79977 of the same registry office on August 14, 1998. 2) K sold Q land owned by it to the Defendant on July 14, 199, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of No. 70146 of the registration of the Daegu District Court on July 20, 199.

3) Since then, P land was combined into the O land, and the area of the O land was increased to 3050 square meters (hereinafter “O land before annexation”), and “O land after annexation” and “O land after annexation.” The combination of O land before annexation, P land, 215/265 shares, and Q land is “each of the instant land.”

(ii) [In the absence of dispute over the basis of recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 2-1, 2, and 3-1, 2-4-1, 2, and 5-1, 2, and 16-1, 2, and 16-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. 1 The Defendant immediately disposed of each of the instant lands to K and donated property to F and C, a son, the Plaintiff et al., to K for the performance of the procedure for claiming the transfer of ownership. The Defendant first transferred the name of the Defendant to the name of the Defendant for six months after the transfer, and then distributed the property, thereby making it difficult to pay taxes. Accordingly, K used each of the instant lands to the Defendant on July 31, 1996 and July 14, 199.