1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 2014, the Plaintiff was elected as the representative for each Dong, Dong, Dong, Dong, Dong (hereinafter “instant apartment”) located in Busan Northern-gu D (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On July 30, 2015, 12 occupants of the instant apartment complex 907, 12, around the instant apartment complex, requested the instant apartment commission to dismiss the Plaintiff on the ground that “The 3rd residents of the instant apartment complex agreed to perform the asphalt packing work of the instant apartment for the purpose of compensating for noise, dust, etc. arising from the said construction work, and caused damage to the instant apartment complex, such as that the Plaintiff caused the 3rd and masting of the instant apartment complex. After becoming the representative of each Dong Dong, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the complaint by 20 days after becoming the representative of each Dong, and the residents’ in a will non-fluencing, led to the removal of the Plaintiff.” On August 18, 2015, the council of occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment complex, which was held on August 18, 2015, passed a resolution demanding the dismissal of the Plaintiff with the consent of 7 members

C. On August 19, 2015, the instant apartment election commission sent a letter to the Plaintiff to submit explanatory materials by August 21, 2015, and made a resolution to the effect that “the grounds for dismissal and the Plaintiff’s explanatory materials are publicly announced to the occupants of 907 Dong, and that the Plaintiff’s dismissal voting is proceeding in parallel with the visiting voting method,” and on August 24, 2015, the instant apartment election commission made a public announcement on August 27, 2015 as of August 26, 2015.

In the foundation, there is no letter and incentive that the apartment corruption prepared by the same representative in 907 can be wideed in our apartment and that there is no incentive.

In light of the contents of false inducements:

1. By imposing monthly water rates, the public charges have been collected in excess of a total of more than a00 million, and used them for other purposes;

2. To use public imposts, such as expenses for individual litigation, for other purposes;