1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as follows, with the exception that the plaintiff added the judgment as to the assertion emphasized by the court of first instance, and that the third 7th 7th tier of the judgment of the court of first instance read the "in accordance with the purport of the application", and that the third 15th tier "Mapo-gu" is "Mapo-gu", and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

In addition, the Plaintiff asserts that “The Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation exempted the Plaintiff from the amount of 7,162,64,640 won for medical treatment fees after delinquency when the Plaintiff paid insurance premiums 9,264,250 won.” The Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation received the entire amount of delinquent insurance premiums in the auction procedure of this case, which is in fact paid by the Plaintiff the total amount of delinquent insurance premiums, and thus, the amount of 7,162,640 won for medical treatment fees after delinquency should be deducted from the amount of dividends of the Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence No. 7, Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation’s instruction to the effect that, as a notice of voluntary payment period from November 27, 2017, Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation provides the Plaintiff with the following information: “If the total amount of delinquent insurance premiums is paid during the period from December 1, 2017 to February 12, 2018, Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation grants exemption from the Corporation’s medical expenses (such as medical treatment or other collection charges after delinquency).”

However, in the instant auction procedure, it is difficult to evaluate that “the Plaintiff voluntarily paid the delinquent premium during the period of voluntary payment” with the content that Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation received the total delinquent premium from Defendant National Health Insurance Corporation before the aforementioned voluntary payment period ( June 8, 2017). The Plaintiff’s assertion on a different premise is without merit.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals against the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.