logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.06.18 2013고정338
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a C Eth Motor Vehicle.

On January 30, 2013, at around 16:35, the Defendant driven the said car, and 3, at the 182-3 level, proceeded back to the front of the Gyeongcheon-gu cafeteria cafeteria cafeteria, which is located in 182-3, with the front side of the Gu camp from the front side of the camp.

Since a house that is not divided into India and a roadway is parked both as a fire-fighting road, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by checking the left and right of a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle at a sufficient interval by reducing the speed and checking the situation, and by checking the safety of the vehicle, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went away without taking measures such as aiding the victim by stopping on the left side of the victim D (Nam, 20 years old), which was coming from the front bank due to the negligence of the Defendant, and was going to the left side of the victim D (Seoul, and 20 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part of the police interrogation protocol of the defendant

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to medical records of a victim);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on traffic accident;

1. Relevant Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, and Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the same Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The gist of the assertion is the defendant and the defendant.

arrow