The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unfluent and unfair.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires a simple and severe punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant, even though he was sentenced by this court on November 20, 2013 to a fine of KRW 20 million on the grounds of violating the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, etc., even though he/she was in the appellate trial, he/she has been repeatedly committed the crime of this case. However, even if he/she had been sentenced to a fine of KRW 20 million in the appellate trial, he/she is led to the confession and rebuttal of the crime of this case, and there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and in full view of various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments such as the age and happiness environment of the defendant, the period of the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed unfair

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.