Do 2013 Do 2101 A. Violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act

(b) Defluence;

A

Defendant

Jeonju District Court Decision 2012No 1239 decided February 6, 2013

May 9, 2013

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are determined.

Examining the record in light of the relevant legal principles, this case on the ground of the same reasons as the judgment of the court below.

All facts of each public prosecution are found guilty, and it is acceptable to acknowledge it as guilty, and at the same time, the argument of the grounds of appeal;

(1) In the event of an assembly or demonstration in violation of the logical and empirical rules; or (2) in violation of

The meaning of "Assembly" as defined in the Act, and the scope of outdoor assemblies prohibited under Article 11 (1) of the Act.

It can not be said that there was an error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles on the act of a political party.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

(2).

Justices Ko Young-han

Jeju High Court Justice Yang Chang-soo

[Attachment-dae]

Justices Kim Chang-suk