logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2007. 01. 23. 선고 2006누11158 판결
명의신탁여부 및 적용시가 적정 여부[국승]
Title

Whether or not title trust is held and the application rate is appropriate

Summary

The judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is groundless.

Related statutes

Donation of title trust under Article 41-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The disposition of imposition of KRW 66,640,00 against the plaintiff on February 5, 2005 by the defendant shall be revoked.

Reasons

The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow