logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 04. 28. 선고 2016두30248 판결
실질과세 원칙상 원고가 양도소득세 부담 의무자다 .[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court (Cheongju)-2013-Nu-568 ( October 28, 2015)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2014- Daejeon-4264 ( November 06, 2014)

Title

Under the substance over form principle, the Plaintiff is liable to pay capital gains tax.

Summary

Even if the Plaintiff did not own real estate, the Plaintiff is a person liable to pay capital gains tax under the substance over form principle.

Related statutes

Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du30248 Decided revocation of Disposition of Property Tax Imposition

Plaintiff

@@@

Defendant

O Head of tax office

Conclusion of Pleadings

Daejeon High Court Decision 2015Nu11910 decided December 10, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

on April 28, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

on April 28, 2016

arrow