beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.
Defendant
B The summary of the judgment of innocence against Defendant B is publicly notified.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on October 2, 2013, the Daegu High Court sentenced on four years to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape in Relatives) and became final and conclusive on November 29 of the same year.
1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;
A. The Defendant forged private documents, on May 4, 2012, using a black pen in blank in the F printing office located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, with a black pen on the blank. The Defendant “a total of KRW 18 million on April 30, 2012, and six million on April 30, 2012; and
5.4. 12 million won received, and on May 4, 2012, written at will, “Welish”.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in the name of the State, a private document concerning the rights and obligations.
B. On May 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) delivered a copy of the above forged document to the victim G, who was unaware of such fact, in the vicinity of the Daegu Northern-dong, Daegu Northern-dong; and (b) exercised it as if the document was duly formed.
2. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and H
A. On April 30, 2012, Defendant A and H made a false statement to the victim G prior to the Silsan apartment located in the Silsan-si, Busan Metropolitan City around April 30, 2012 that “When investing money, he/she is a new factory, and is in a place where he/she is subject to solvents.” It is recognized by us that all kinds of tasks, such as solvents, drums, transportation, etc., are carried out. Any f0,00 liters may be sold at least 60,000 won per day, and at least 60,000 won per liter may be calculated as KRW 10,000 per day.”
However, even if the above victim received the purchase price of the oil storage tank, there was no intention or ability to operate the factory by purchasing the oil storage tank.
Nevertheless, Defendant A is the victim's 6 million won as the oil storage tank down payment on the same day, and the same year.
5. The balance of 4. The payment was made in the aggregate of 12 million won as the name of the remaining person;
As a result, Defendant A conspired with H.