logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.27 2017고단5329
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 5329"

1. On October 18, 2017, around 11:00 on October 18, 2017, the Defendant damaged the reading center for the victim D (n, 33 years of age) located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim living together did not open a door, without opening the door, the Defendant damaged the reading center.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the market-free reading center that is owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place set forth in Paragraph 1, and assaulted F’s chest at one time by hand to prevent access from D from the slope F belonging to the Seoul Geum-gu Police Station E (Seoul), which was called out after receiving a report of D 112.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

"2018 Highest 1420"

1. On February 14, 2018, at around 01:40, the Defendant: (a) failed to provide alcoholic beverages to the victim at the “I” restaurant operated by the Victim H in G on a light name; and (b) failed to provide alcoholic beverages even if he/she repeatedly demands the victim to do so, the Defendant was able to fill the disturbance, such as the name of the victim H, a boomed by two customers, and then brining the Plaintiff “A. on a width house”; and (c) brining the brin on the main floor of the main floor, he/she sawd the victim with a bath, brining the victim, and brining the brine by placing two brins on the table.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force for about 30 minutes from the above day to 02:10 on the same day.

2. The Defendant damaged property: (a) the victim H’s market price on the table and at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) was laid on a fluorily fluor; and (b) the fluor in a fluoring station, which was placed on the fluor, entered the ging part where the gluor was installed on the fluor, and caused the gluor to flow into the part where the gluor was installed on the gluor, so that the gluor could not know of the repair cost.

In this respect, the defendant is obliged to have two necks owned by the victim.

arrow