Text
1. The Defendant: (a) against the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor KRW 266,61,200 and KRW 205,871,976 among them, from August 27, 2014 to June 3, 2015.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor
A. On May 15, 2009, KRW 40 million was determined as 19% per annum on May 15, 2010; KRW 140,000 on May 17, 2010; KRW 16% per annum on May 15, 201; KRW 16% per annum on January 24, 201; KRW 16% per annum on January 24, 201; KRW 16% per annum on loans to the Defendant on May 24, 201; KRW 16% per annum on January 24, 201; KRW 16% per annum on loans; and KRW 19% per annum on loans to the Defendant on June 15, 2012; and KRW 24% per annum on loans transferred to the Defendant on June 15, 2012; and KRW 164% per annum on loans transferred to the Defendant on June 24, 2017.
On February of the judgment by service (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3) of the Plaintiff’s claim, the Plaintiff transferred each of the above loans principal and interest to the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff during the instant lawsuit pending, and the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.