logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.05.21 2014고합17
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:20 on December 4, 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim E (the age of 15) who does not have any special friendly relationship with the victim in the D Library in Seopo-si C, Seopopo-si, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against the victim by breaking the victim’s shoulder with his knee, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc.; and (b) committed an indecent act by force against the victim’s knife, knife.

As a result, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of E and F;

1. Statements made by witnesses G in the fourth trial records;

1. The statements of witnesses H and I in the seventh trial records;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and field photographs;

1. Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act, which select the relevant criminal facts and punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. In light of the circumstances surrounding the instant crime, etc., it is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant was guilty on the part of the Defendant, who was exempted from the disclosure order and notification order, due to the lack of the record of punishment for a sexual crime, and thus, the registration of personal information and the participation in the sexual assault treatment program alone appears to have the effect of preventing recidivism, and in full view of all the circumstances such as the benefits expected by the disclosure order or notification order and the effect of prevention, disadvantage and side effects resulting therefrom, it is deemed that there is a special reason that the disclosure of personal information should not be disclosed and notified).

arrow