A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2014, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) while driving EXE cars on the front of the D in Soyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, the Defendant: (b) was under the influence of alcohol on the front of D on the road; (c) was requested by the head F (32) of the Gyeongyang Police Station Traffic Control Department, who was under the influence of drinking; (d) went away from the site; and (e) was f (32) who was under the influence of drinking; and (e) was f (i) who was f (i) whose number of days of treatment cannot be known by asking the hand, etc. of the driver F of the Gyeongyang Police Station, which was carrying on a alcohol measuring instrument, caused damage to the character of hand, etc. on which the number of days of treatment cannot be known; and (b) the Defendant caused damage to the left-hand part of the son G

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties concerning the control of drinking driving and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, inflicted each injury on the police officer.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of the measurement of alcoholic beverages) was demanded by the Defendant to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting the alcohol measuring instruments three times in total from G G at the border of the traffic control division belonging to the Goyang Police Station, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle by drinking while driving an EX while drinking the motor vehicle at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1) as shown in the above paragraph (1).

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as described in the above paragraph (1), committed violence against the police officer F, etc., and avoided this, and did not comply with the police officer’s request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of F and G police statement;

1. A report on the current status of drivers;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Medical certificates and opinions;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties), Article 148-2(1)2 and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime.