(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.05.22 2014고정310

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.05.22 2014고정310

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant

The sentence of sentence against A shall be suspended.

Defendant

B shall be innocent.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 17:00 on January 30, 2014, around 17:00, the victim E (the age of 49) sought a debt repayment with the workplace Dong F, and requested the defendant's mother B to see that "the defendant and the defendant's mother B was defective in the bath theory that "the defendant spath, opening, spathing, spathing, spathing, spathing, and opening", and the defendant was spathing the victim's face with his hand and spathing the victim's face twice by hand, while the victim's entrance part was spathing for about 3 weeks in the victim's hand, and the victim suffered an injury to the spathn part that needs to be treated for about 3 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. First police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (Attachment of E permanent photographs), investigation reports (Attachment of a medical certificate), investigation reports (Statement of Witnesses);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of a fine;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of suspended sentence: The portion not guilty under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (including the circumstances leading to the commission of a crime, the relationship with the victim, and the absence of any criminal record), [300,000 won of a fine to be suspended from the suspension of sentence, and 100,000 won of a day of confinement for

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged by Defendant B is as follows: (a) the Defendant, together with A, injured the victim E (the age of 49).

According to the evidence of the judgment of the court below, at the time of the crime of Gap, the defendant was living together for about four years until March 2013, and the defendant was in fact a person who was at the end of one year, in relation to the victim. The defendant was in the place where the victim was living together for about four years, and was in his/her own father, and he/she was in the place where he/she was working for him/her, and he/she was in the time of the victim's entrance part at one time.

If so, at the time, the defendant is a victim who is unable to use his personal wheels and has been exposed to his or her desire.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2014.11.14 2014노1712

-서울북부지방법원 2017.03.16 2016고단1346 (2)

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2019.09.19 2019고단232

-청주지방법원 2017.08.22 2016고단2943

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.04.30 2014고합207