The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the modified facts charged of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal principles on dangerous goods, self-defense, and emergency evacuation in the crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.).

In addition, the court below's rejection of the defendant's claim on mental and physical disability based on the circumstances as stated in its reasoning is justified.

There is no error of incomplete deliberation on mental illness.

In addition, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.