beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around October 2015, the defendant of "2016 Highest 4678" is entitled to profit if he/she imports and sells the mother fee in China from the victim D's residence of the victim of "105 Dong-dong 15 XX Dong, Nam-gu, Gwangju, Seoul, about October 2015.
B. It stated that one-half of the profits would be paid if money was invested to B.
However, at the time, the Defendant did not have any particular property or income, while the Defendant was liable for a debt of 300 million won due to the failure of the business, and there was no intention or ability to divide the profits by using the money from the victim as the promise, even if he received the money from the victim, because he thought that he would use the money from the victim to pay his living expenses or debt.
Defendant 1 received total of KRW 50,00,000 from the victim’s false statement and received KRW 312,20,000 from the victim’s account in the name of E on October 20, 2015 from the victim, and received total of KRW 312,20,000 through 16 times from April 4, 2016, as shown in Table 1.
around October 2014, the Defendant of "2016 Highest 5041" at the GDB life insurance branch office located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju around October 2014, the Defendant is entitled to pay the victim F the amount of KRW 100 to 20 million per the household life bank in Incheon and Seoul.
On the face of lending money, the 15% interest per month was paid, and the second and second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second and the second were
However, at the time of fact, the defendant was able to use the money from the damaged party for the repayment of his/her obligation because he/she did not have any particular property or income, so it was impossible to purchase a second and second name bank and make profits from the purchase, so it was impossible to repay the borrowed money and pay
The Defendant, on November 20, 201, around 200.