logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.30 2017고합239
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant’s contact with juvenile C (n, 14 years old) and smartphone D(D) is the first gap.

No one shall provide or promise to provide money, valuables or other property gains, duties, convenience, etc. to children or juveniles, but the defendant reconvened a female with a single gender by providing C with approximately KRW 38,000,00 in 18,00 in flive taxi and return to flive taxi, which was found in the defendant's house located in E 204, around May 3, 2017.

As a result, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing child and juvenile sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The first statement made to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (a face-to-face result of suspect);

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which is applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 13 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 10 million won to 25 million won;

2. Scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not apply by selecting a fine.

3. Determination of sentence: The crime of this case is punishable by a fine of KRW 10 million in that the defendant purchased the sex of a child of 14 years of age who does not have any place to go out of the country, and that the sexual concept is not completely established and that it interferes with the formation of a proper sexual concept for children and juveniles who do not have any ability to determine.

However, there is no criminal history against the defendant, and the defendant is considered in favor of the defendant's depth and reflects his/her criminal act.

arrow