Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a licensed real estate agent operating the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant A is a brokerage assistant belonging to the above B and assist the business.

1. Defendant A

A. On August 24, 2012, at G coffee shop located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 15:00, the Defendant arranged a contract for acquisition of rights between H and the victim I (the South and the age of 59) at the G coffee shop operated by I. However, the victim was obliged to compensate the said H for the penalty for failing to perform the said contract.

On September 21, 2012, the Defendant received a request from the victim for consultation on compensation for penalty for H, and kept a check of KRW 170 million under the pretext of agreement with the victim. From October 2012 to December 2, 2012, the Defendant returned to the new-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and the new-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and used the entire amount of the said check in mind in purchasing the ticket.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

(b) A real estate broker, etc. who violates the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act shall not receive money or goods in excess of the fees or actual expenses under the Enforcement Rule of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act under any pretext, such as reward

Nevertheless, the above defendant is the defendant.

In mediating a contract for the acquisition of the right at the Jcafeteria, I received money in excess of KRW 2,385,000 (0.9% of the transaction amount) which is the maximum of the brokerage commission prescribed by the above Enforcement Rule by receiving KRW 30,000 from I under the pretext of brokerage commission.

2. Defendant B had the Defendant work as an intermediary assistant at the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office.

A, who is a broker assistant of the defendant, shall from I above 1.B.

The highest limit of the commission, such as paragraph.