Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, while the victim D(17 years of age) and the victim E(18 years of age) were holding a cell phone NA, they were aware that they were named as "the defendants" and "domination" and "domination", the victims were able to know that they were called "the defendants."

1. At around 02:00 on May 5, 2012, Defendant A, on the front side of Pyeongtaek-si F, took the victim’s face face level on the same ground as above, and on the same day at around 02:30 on the front side of Pyeongtaek-si G, Defendant A taken the victim’s E-line.

2. At around 02:30 on May 5, 2012, Defendant B responded to the victim E in front of Pyeongtaek-si G, on the ground that, as seen above, the victim respondeded that the victim D was not able to take a bath during the crypting of the victim D while having talked with the victim D after having been called with the victim E after having been traveling along with the victim E, the Defendant sent the victim’s face part of the victim D, making the victim take a bath during the crypting process, and drinking the victim E.

As a result, the defendants suffered injury to the victim D, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim D, such as the left-hand chin, and the victim E, and suffered injury, such as the mouth of the riverbed combination that requires approximately seven weeks of medical treatment to the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of police statement of D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the certificate of injury to D or E;

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 263 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires more emphasis on the degree of damage of victim E for the reason of sentencing of each provisional payment order, and even if there were two previous cases, the defendant A reached this case. However, the defendants still have to be considered in the circumstances where the defendants had committed a serious contingent violence event against E, and the defendants have to be considered in depth.