logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고정1120
점유이탈물횡령등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 31, 2010, the Defendant: (a) found at the Chungcheong-gun B apartment playground, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheong-gun, Samsung C, the victim’s possession of Samsung C, Samsung C, a new physical card, a driver’s license, a resident registration certificate, a red locker that contains red lockings.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. On October 31, 2010, the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) purchased clothing equivalent to KRW 35,000 from E located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si; (b) presented the victim’s Samsung C’s Samsung C’s Samsung C card acquired as stated in paragraph (1); and (c) used the lost debit card upon signing the sales slip.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement C to the Act

1. Relevant Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, Article 70 (1) 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant had already received a decision to send the case to the Juvenile Department for the same kind of crime in around 2010 and thereafter, the same crime of the same kind of crime was subsequently charged late around 2010 while he faithfully worked as a marina employee without any particular criminal power, and thus, the punishment as the order of the summary order shall be determined by reducing the fine amount in the summary order.

arrow