A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:00 on September 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol, had the ability to discern things or make decisions; (b) around September 24, 2014, at the D Manpower Office located in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant performed an act together with the victim E, etc., and told other persons to know his own sprink during eating with the victim; (c) carried the victim’s head head part once in a time; and (d) laid down a sprink, which is a dangerous object located on the floor, with the victim’s left part, side bucks, and buckbucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as 112 withdrawn and report on the results thereof, etc.;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for the mitigation of mental illness and injury (a person with mental disability caused by drinking);

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (including cases where he/she repents his/her errors late and late);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by breaking a shoulderer's disease, which is a prone and dangerous object, even though the defendant was dead, in light of the background of the crime in this case, the degree of damage and the risk of the method of the crime, etc., although the crime in this case is not less specific, the defendant did not have the same criminal power except for the punishment of a fine of KRW 200,000 in 1980, and the crime in this case was committed contingent upon the end of a minor vision while he was in a state of mental and physical disability due to drinking, and in the investigation stage, the victim agreed with the victim at the investigation stage.