Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, from October 1, 2013 to January 15, 2014, under employment under the condition that F, the main business operator of the “E” D3rd floor D, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul, receive monthly pay 1,500,000 won, customers open a door door at the above business establishment, perform drinking water heart and clean the guest room. Defendant B was employed from November 16, 2013 to November 21, 2013 to receive KRW 50,000 per day, and provided guidance to customers and clean the guest room.

As a result, Defendant A and B arranged sexual traffic in collusion with F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B;

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of suspect with regard to F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning G, H and I;

1. Each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and Article 30 of the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act (Article 48 (1) 1 of the same Act (Article 943-1 and 2 of the pressure No. 943 of the Incheon District Public Prosecutor's Office, 2013), Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (Article 943-3 and 4 of the pressure No. 943 of the Incheon District Public Prosecutor's Office, 2013);

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. From October 1, 2013, Defendant A worked as an employee at the instant sexual traffic business establishment from around October 1, 2013.

In light of the fact that the court was under trial and continued to serve as an employee, there is a high need to punish the defendant.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant is divided by mistake, there is no record of the same kind of crime, and other factors of sentencing, such as the period of participation of the defendant, age, character and conduct of the defendant, family relationship, etc.

2. Defendant B’s error.