Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:00 on July 10, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) committed a disturbance within the police station, which is a government office, at around 30 minutes, in the so-called Yeongdeungpo Military Police Station located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, with a view to getting a taxi under the influence of alcohol and visiting the taxi to enter the police station within the view of leaving the taxi from the taxi, and asking the Defendant for the reason of visit; (b) the Defendant solicited the police officer to guide and return home to the police station by asking the reason for the visit; (c) on the part of the police officer visiting the taxi to stop from the taxi; and (d) the Defendant recommended the police officer to visit the police station to stop from the taxi and return to the police station, such as “I wish to walk the scar if inside the scar, you will walk the scar and take the scar.”

2. Around July 10, 2014, on the grounds that the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the criminal office and office of the same police station around 01:59, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim B, a police officer, among the Defendant, his family members, etc. of the other cases, by putting the victim B (the age of 40), such as “ring the age of 40, i.e., son, bitch, bitch bitch.”

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Each written statement prepared D and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of disturbance for the revocation of a public prosecution), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the need for arrest was insufficient at the time of the instant case and the requirements for the arrest of a flagrant offender were not satisfied, the arrest of a flagrant offender without notifying the gist of the suspected crime, the reason for the arrest, the right to appoint a defense counsel, etc. was unlawful, and thus, the Defendant took a bath during