logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.08.22 2019고단119
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 5, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Daegu Prison on November 23, 2016. On February 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court Port Branch Branch Branch, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on August 22, 2017. On May 18, 2018, the Daegu District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and continued to be terminated on May 24, 2018.

[2019 Highest 119]

1. At around 04:20 on December 2, 2018, the Defendant was provided with the “Dju” operated by the victim C in Gumi-si B, and the Defendant was provided with alcohol and alcohol and entertainment entertainment services equivalent to KRW 180,000 in total from the victim, even though there was no intent or ability to pay the drinking value normally because there was no cash or card or other means of payment.

2. On December 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) on the apartment road in front of the apartment complex in the Guro-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on December 24, 2018; (b) was active as if the Defendant had no intent or ability to pay taxi expenses; and (c) was active as if the Defendant would normally pay taxi expenses to the victim F; and (d) was provided with passenger transportation services worth KRW 7,000 on the ground that the Defendant moved to the same H market operated by the victim and moved to the

3. On January 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 15:40, the Defendant was provided food equivalent to KRW 12,00,00 in the sum of the blades and three bottles, etc., which were 12,00,00, even though there was no effective means of payment; (b) the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value; and (c) so, the Defendant was provided with food equivalent to the sum of 12,00,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victims, received property and acquired pecuniary benefits.

[2019 Highest388]

1. On December 4, 2018:

arrow