1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that, at the request of the M&D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S

B. Determination 1) Article 14(1)2 and (2) of the Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act provides that “When the ordering person, the principal contractor and the subcontractor have agreed on the direct payment of the subcontract price, the ordering person shall directly pay the subcontractor the subcontract price corresponding to the part executed by the subcontractor, and in such a case, the principal contractor’s obligation to pay the subcontract price to the principal contractor and the principal contractor’s obligation to pay the subcontractor the subcontract price to the subcontractor shall expire within the scope thereof.” (2) In full view of each of the statements in subparagraphs 1 through 3, 1 and 1, the Defendant company entered into a subcontract contract with the non-party company with respect to construction work of reinforced concrete among the instant construction work around November 10, 2015, the Plaintiff, who is a handling company, such as heat, etc., supplied the heat at the site of the instant construction from January 1 to June 2016 to June 1, 2016 to June 3, 2016.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.